Peer Review Process
All manuscripts submitted to CEMP 2026 undergo a double-blind peer-review process to ensure academic integrity, originality, and scientific quality.
Each paper will be reviewed by at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise.
Reviewers are selected from the CEMP 2026 Technical and Scientific Committee, as well as external domain experts.
Authors’ identities are concealed from reviewers, and reviewers’ identities are concealed from authors.
Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on:
Relevance to the conference theme
Technical content and accuracy
Novelty and originality
Clarity of presentation and conclusions
Significance of resultsOnly papers that meet the required scientific standards will be accepted for presentation and publication.
Reviewer Acknowledgment
A complete list of reviewers (name, affiliation, and country) will be provided upon completion of the review process and will also be acknowledged in the proceedings preface.